Dempsey Law Blog

Fox Valley Law Firm Serving Oshkosh, Ripon, Fond du Lac and Surrounding Fox Cities

Archive for January, 2010

Tips for Employers Making Employment Decisions

Posted by dempseylawfirm on January 21, 2010

1.     Engage legal counsel early in the process.

2.     Review thoroughly the relevant facts and files prior to making the decision.

3.     Use our firm’s “independent” internal review process so that decisions are reviewed before being finalized.

4.     After discussion with counsel, prepare a note or memo to document the decision, the supporting evidence, and the legal basis at the time the decision is made.

5.     Spend time and effort writing a good position statement if responding to a charge.

6.     With the advice of counsel, assess the risks and identify the best strategy to defend or settle early on.

For more information about our firm, please go to www.dempseylaw.com.

Posted in Business Lawyer, Employment Lawyer, Trial Lawyer | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Checklist for a Deposition Witness

Posted by dempseylawfirm on January 21, 2010

  1. Be prepared to spend the necessary time with your attorney to get ready.
  2. Identify and have available all of the relevant documents and other records you need to prove the case.
  3. Unless advised otherwise, spend time going over the facts or files so that you are very familiar with them.
  4. Carefully listen to and understand any key points emphasized by your attorney.
  5. Get a good night’s sleep so that you are rested and alert.
  6. Dress comfortably, but appropriately, so as to make a good impression.
  7. Answer only the question asked – not what you think the questioner is seeking.
  8. Tell the truth.

For more information about our firm, please go to www.dempseylaw.com.

Posted in Business Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer, Employment Lawyer, Family Law Lawyer, Personal Injury Lawyer, Trial Lawyer, Workers Compensation Lawyer | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Changes in Employment Law

Posted by dempseylawfirm on January 21, 2010

2009 Wisconsin Act 20, effective July 1, 2009, expands Wisconsin Fair Employment Law to make available compensatory and punitive damages for employment discrimination.  This is a significant change to the law, and presents new opportunities and new pitfalls for both employees and employers.  These damages are now available along with the other remedies of back pay, reinstatement, and attorneys’ fees in employment cases, and bring Wisconsin law more closely in alignment with Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act.

Compensatory damages typically go beyond traditional remedies and would encompass “front pay,” e.g., wages or salary that would have been paid in the future but for the adverse employment action.  Punitive damages are special damages available where an employer has acted in a particularly unlawful manner or in bad faith, and are used to “punish” the employer into behaving better in the future.

Employee Considerations

Compensatory and punitive damages may be available to the aggrieved employee, but only if two things occur: (1) the employee must first be successful in an administrative proceeding with the Equal Rights Division and obtain a “probable cause” determination, and (2) must then commence an action in circuit court to obtain the additional damages.  The new law also provides for a jury trial on these issues.  Employees are required to exhaust their administrative remedies first before they can bring their case to the circuit court.

For employees who may have a cause of action, the new changes to the Wisconsin law allow for expanded remedies, and the opportunity to recover a larger amount from an employer who has violated the law.  Employers’ liability for compensatory and punitive damages is capped, however, with the maximum amount that can be recovered set at $300,000.  It becomes even more important now if you suspect that you may 

be a victim of employment discrimination, you should hire an attorney as early as you can in the process.  This is necessary to insure that all possible bases of discrimination are reviewed (including any potential retaliation claims), and that the charges filed in the administrative proceeding are handled correctly.  Our attorneys are very experienced with the filing of these charges and have represented numerous employees in successful outcomes.

Employer Considerations

Dempsey Law attorneys have long advised business clients about terminations and employment decisions and have brought significant value to employers in these cases.  For employers, the stakes of losing have gone up, with new potential for additional exposure.  Our lawyers believe in a “proactive” approach, and can ably assist the employer early on in the process to reduce or eliminate any liability. 

An employment lawyer should be involved as early as possible in the employment decision process with the employer.  This is an opportunity early on to discuss the planned action, assess the facts and the risks, and determine the appropriate strategy.  Yes, it may cost a little money up front for the employer, but it can pay huge dividends down the road if the discrimination charges, circuit court case, and alleged damages can be eliminated or substantially reduced.

Another proactive approach we recommend for employers is to conduct an employment law “audit.”  This exercise, which could involve five to ten hours of an employment attorney’s time, results in a thorough review of the employer’s employment practices and documentation, a report, and recommendations, if called for, on how to better protect the employer’s interests.

Significant Deadlines

For both employees and employers, there are some significant dates and time periods to keep in mind during an employment case.  After a hearing examiner finds, or LIRC affirms a 

finding of probable cause, the employee must be notified in writing that he or she may bring a civil action in circuit court to recover compensatory or punitive damages.  Under the new Act, the time limit for bringing a civil action is 60 days from the time of the hearing examiner’s final decision is mailed to the employee, or if the examiner’s decision is reviewed by LIRC, 60 days after LIRC’s final decision is mailed to the employee.

Conclusion

As of July 1, 2009 the potential rewards for aggrieved employees and the potential risks for employers facing charges have gone up in employment discrimination cases.  Compensatory and punitive damages are now available, and the aggrieved employee is now entitled to a jury trial in circuit court on these damages, if probable cause is found.  This will require that both employees and employers understand their rights and take the appropriate steps to protect themselves and their economic interests.

For more information about our firm, please go to www.dempseylaw.com.

Posted in Business Lawyer, Employment Lawyer, Trial Lawyer | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The Art of Deposition Testimony (or “Oh my God, why do they want to talk with me?”)

Posted by dempseylawfirm on January 21, 2010

If you are ever involved in civil litigation as either a plaintiff, a defendant, or as a witness, you may be called upon to give a “deposition.”  A deposition means that you are testifying under oath but not in court.  Dempsey, Williamson, Kelly & Hertel, LLP has long maintained a substantial litigation practice.  Our experienced lawyers can ably assist you in litigation, whether you are party to a lawsuit, or called as a witness.

What is a Deposition? 

A deposition is the act of testifying under oath as a witness in a legal proceeding, with the testimony recorded to be used at a later date.

Why do attorneys use depositions?

They do so for several reasons, including: possible impeachment of later testimony; to obtain admissions; to obtain and preserve evidence; to clarify the issues for trial; and to evaluate the witness prior to trial.

What is the deposition process like?

It is an informal process, usually in an informal setting, such as a law office, conference room, or hotel conference room, rather than in a courtroom.  It usually occurs early on in a case, during what is called the “discovery” phase prior to trial.  There is no judge or magistrate in attendance and it is not open to the general public.  Attendees usually consist of the parties to the lawsuit, the parties’ legal counsel, the person whose deposition is being taken (the “deponent”), and a stenographer to transcribe testimony and produce a written transcript.  Other potential witnesses or interested parties are generally excluded.

Usually, all of the participants are seated around a conference table, with the deponent who is being questioned seated close to the stenographer.  The deponent will be asked questions by opposing counsel, often as though the deponent was under cross-examination at trial.  Opposing counsel will attempt to discover background information, new facts, and solicit damaging testimony, if possible.  Opposing counsel may, if he or she chooses, use “leading” types of questions with a deponent.

What are some practical tips to help me through this?

Spend time reviewing.  First and foremost, spend some time beforehand recalling and reviewing the facts that 

you will be testifying about.  Take a few moments to review any relevant records or notes, but do not bring any records, notes, or documents with you to a deposition unless you are told to do so.  Our lawyers are very experienced at preparing deponents for a deposition, and can fully assist you to prepare within legal and ethical boundaries.

Know facts and details and personal info.  Be familiar with all correspondence, photos, drawings, etc., or other documents which may be important to the case and about which you have direct knowledge.  Know your personal background information, current and past employers and addresses, and the department, division, or group organizational structure you work in if relevant.  These are all “everyday” facts that you should be familiar with, but you would be surprised at the number of people who are deposed who “draw a blank” when asked some very simple questions in this area.

Understand the question asked.  Be sure you fully and completely understand a question before you answer.  If you do not understand the question, or it seems too complicated, make no attempt to answer but instead ask that it be re-phrased, be stated in a different way, or broken down into smaller, simpler pieces.  An inaccurate answer to a misunderstood question could materially affect the results of the case.  As a deponent it is your responsibility to think before you answer – and give your legal counsel time to object to the question prior to your attempt to answer.

Answer the question as briefly as possible.  When answering a question, if possible, try to use a “yes” or “no” answer.  Do not volunteer additional information that a question does not call for, unless it is necessary to make your answer not misleading.  Answer only the question asked.  Do not guess or speculate about an answer.

Maintain a pleasant demeanor.  Answer all questions with a polite and cooperative attitude.  Try to remain calm, particularly if you think you are being “badgered” by the questioner.  Your lawyer will be present and he or she will do whatever is necessary and effective in the circumstances to protect you from any overzealous or intimidating tactics.

Avoid exaggeration.  Exaggerating is a form of untruthfulness.  Do not try to improve on the facts.  The facts are the facts.  Trying to exaggerate invariably is recognized by opposing counsel for what it is, and he or she will later exploit it to undermine your credibility at trial.

Make an effort to enunciate clearly.  Since your testimony is being recorded by a stenographer, make an effort to enunciate clearly.  Speak audibly and in a normal tone of conversation so the stenographer can 

record precisely what you say.  Avoid non-verbal communication, such as nodding your head, shrugging your shoulders, etc., as these physical gestures cannot be captured in writing by the stenographer.

Present your best appearance.  One of the objectives of a deposition is for legal counsel to get a “preview” of what you would be like as a witness at trial.  Opposing counsel will be appraising you and making some tentative evaluations of how you will impress the jury.  So, it is best to make a good first impression.  For the deposition dress neatly and conventionally.  Be articulate and confident.  Stay interested in the questions and the process, and project a sincere, candid demeanor.

Contemplate dates, times, and measurements accurately.  The case you are involved in may turn on a crucial fact.  Very often, deponents are careless with respect to dates, times and measurements.  An inaccurate answer is often the result of not giving the subject sufficient consideration.  It is important to review these kinds of details in advance.  Don’t allow yourself to be forced into a guessing game with opposing counsel.  If your best judgment is asked for, and based on the information you have, you are unable to make a reliable judgment, say so.  You can certainly also say that it is not possible to make a reasonable estimate with the information that you have, and you would only be guessing.  Also, if you cannot be certain of a fact, say so. 

Do not qualify favorable facts.  Answer questions concerning favorable details of your case as positively and definitively as possible.  If you know you are certain of your answer, avoid expressions like “I think” or “I guess.” 

Conclusion

With depositions, as with other things, we often fear what we do not understand.  This article is designed to give you that basic understanding.  Understanding the deposition process, and taking the time to prepare in advance, will enhance the prospects of a successful conclusion to your case.  Our attorneys can ably assist you with this preparation.

record precisely what you say.  Avoid non-verbal communication, such as nodding your head, shrugging your shoulders, etc., as these physical gestures cannot be captured in writing by the stenographer.

Present your best appearance.  One of the objectives of a deposition is for legal counsel to get a “preview” of what you would be like as a witness at trial.  Opposing counsel will be appraising you and making some tentative evaluations of how you will impress the jury.  So, it is best to make a good first impression.  For the deposition dress neatly and conventionally.  Be articulate and confident.  Stay interested in the questions and the process, and project a sincere, candid demeanor.

Contemplate dates, times, and measurements accurately.  The case you are involved in may turn on a crucial fact.  Very often, deponents are careless with respect to dates, times and measurements.  An inaccurate answer is often the result of not giving the subject sufficient consideration.  It is important to review these kinds of details in advance.  Don’t allow yourself to be forced into a guessing game with opposing counsel.  If your best judgment is asked for, and based on the information you have, you are unable to make a reliable judgment, say so.  You can certainly also say that it is not possible to make a reasonable estimate with the information that you have, and you would only be guessing.  Also, if you cannot be certain of a fact, say so.

Do not qualify favorable facts.  Answer questions concerning favorable details of your case as positively and definitively as possible.  If you know you are certain of your answer, avoid expressions like “I think” or “I guess.” 

Conclusion

With depositions, as with other things, we often fear what we do not understand.  This article is designed to give you that basic understanding.  Understanding the deposition process, and taking the time to prepare in advance, will enhance the prospects of a successful conclusion to your case.  Our attorneys can ably assist you with this preparation.

For more information about our firm, please go to www.dempseylaw.com.

Posted in Business Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer, Employment Lawyer, Family Law Lawyer, Personal Injury Lawyer, Trial Lawyer, Workers Compensation Lawyer | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »